Text as a meaning-generating dialogue and a lacing metaphor: the experience of converging Yuri Lotman’s and Michail Bakhtin’s approaches
- DOI
- 10.5922/2225-5346-2022-2-3
- Pages
- 55-74
Abstract
The article presents a reflection on Yuri Lotman’s idea of reorienting semiotics from the analysis of structures to the analysis of texts and their binary diagogical nature. This idea allows correlating Lotman’s approach with Bakhtin’s concept of a continuous, meaning-generating dialogue. The juxtaposition of these approaches opens up new possibilities for expanding the semiotic analysis of the processes of meaning formation, metaphorization, the dynamics of culture, and the correlation of social and personal experience in these dynamics. The prospects of expanding the scope of the apparatus of semiotics, such as the narrative approach, deep semiotics, and analysis of the dynamics of social institutionalization of sign structures, are revealed. This, in turn, opens up new horizons for the development of the theory of meaning and understanding, the convergence and juxtaposition of semiotic and hermeneutic traditions, analytical philosophy and phenomenology, abstract modeling and the role of subjectivity (self-consciousness of self). Such extensions and perspectives realize the potential of semiotics as an effective conceptual platform of interdisciplinarity and convergence of scientific disciplines in understanding the ongoing transformations and responsible socio-cultural engineering.
Reference
Aristotle, 1976. Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 1 [Works in four volumes. Vol. 1]. Moscow (in Russ.).
Bakhtin, M. M., 1996. Sobranie sochinenii v semi tomakh [Collected works in seven volumes]. Moscow (in Russ.).
Buber, M., 1993. Ya i Ty [I and Thou]. Moscow (in Russ.).
Damasio, A., 2010. Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain. Pantheon, 384 p.
Emerson, C., 2022. Lotman and Bakhtin. In: M. Tamm and P. Torop, eds. The Companion to Juri Lotman: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. London; New York; Dublin: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, pp. 78—90.
Gusev, S. S., 1984. Nauka i metafora [Science and Metaphor]. Leningrad (in Russ.).
Harari, Yu. N., 2019. Sapiens. Kratkaya istoriya chelovechestva [Sapiens. A Brief History of Humankind]. Moscow (in Russ.).
Heidegger, M., 2015. Bytie i vremya [Being and time]. Moscow (in Russ.).
Henrich, D., 2018. Myshlenie i samobytie. Chteniya o sub"ektivnosti [Thinking and being. Readings about subjectivity]. Moscow (in Russ.).
Ivanov, Vyach. Vs., 1978. Chet i nechet: asimmetriya mozga i znakovykh sistem [Even and Odd: Asymmetry of the Brain and Sign Systems]. Moscow (in Russ.).
Kripke, S., 1972. Naming and necessity. In: Semantics of natural language. Dordrecht.
Kun, T., 2009. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsii [The structure of scientific revolutions]. Moscow (in Russ.).
Lakoff, J., Johnson, M., 2008. Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem [Metaphors we live by]. Moscow (in Russ.).
Levinas, E., 2006. Put’ k drugomu [Way to another]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).
Lotman, Yu. M., 2022. Lecture at Tartu State University, March 13, 1981. Slovo.ru: Baltic accent, 13 (2), pp. 10—23 (in Russ.).
Miall, D. S., ed., 1982. Metaphor: problems and perspectives. Brighton: Harvester press, 172 p.
Ortony, A., ed., 1993. Metaphor and thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 696 p.
Popovich, M. V., 1979. Ocherk razvitiya logicheskikh idei v kul’turno-istoricheskom kontekste [Sketch of the development of logical ideas in a cultural and historical context]. Kyiv (in Russ.).
Russell, B., 1914. Problemy filosofii [Philosophy problems]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).
Russell, B., 1957. Chelovecheskoe poznanie: ego sfera i granitsy [Human cognition: its scope and boundaries]. Moscow (in Russ.).
Schreider, Yu. A., 1965. On one model of the semantic theory of information. Problemy kibernetiki [Problems of Cybernetics], 13, pp. 233—240 (in Russ.).
Tulchinskii, G. L., 1985. Factors of artistic culture dynamics. Sovetskoe iskusstvoznanie [Soviet art history], 19/83, Vol. 2. Moscow, pp. 220—248 (in Russ.).
Tulchinskii, G. L., 1986. “New” theories of Truth and “naïve” semantics (On alternative theories of truth in modern logical semantics). Voprosy filosofii [Problems of Philosophy], 3, pp. 727—732 (in Russ.).
Tulchinskii, G. L., 2018. The problem of meaning in Social Semiotics: deep semiotics as a conceptual extension of Social Semiotics. Slovo. ru: baltic accent, 9 (4), pp. 15—26 (in Russ.).
Tulchinskii, G. L., 2019. Extensions of the Semiotic Analysis Capabilities: the Sources and Content of the “Deep Semiotics” Concept. Voprosy filosofii [Problems of Philosophy], 11, pp. 115—125 (in Russ.).
Turner, V., 1983. Simvol i ritual [Symbol and ritual]. Moscow: Nauka (in Russ.).
Zolyan, S. T., 2022. Yuri Lotman: On problems of language and linguistics. Voprosy Jazykoznanija [Topics in the study of language], 1, pp. 106—119 (in Russ.).