An escape from the embrace of politics. A study into the cultures of remembrance as a means to encourage a historical dialogue in Lithuanian-Russian relations
- DOI
- 10.5922/2079-8555-2012-2-1
- Pages
- 4-12
Abstract
This article focuses on the factors inhibiting a productive rethinking of the past in contemporary Lithuanian-Russian relations. The rethinking of the past is understood as a process facilitating the reconsideration of historical meanings through adjusting them to the expectations and values of the contemporary society. The author argues that in this process historical research — as an important tool for encouraging the co-existence of communities —should fulfil certain social functions. Having chosen the Lithuanian-Russian communication space as a case, the author emphasizes the need to develop an interest in mutual knowledge of cultures of remembrance in this space. Outlining the strategies specific to the prevailing cultures of remembrance in contemporary Russia and Lithuania, the author addresses the issue of their proper relationship, as well as that of the appropriateness of historical policy. The criminalisation of certain evaluations of the past and the academic dialogue between historians are regarded as two opposite extremes of historical policy actually existing in the Lithuanian-Russian communication space. The author stresses that research into the values and interpretations of the past peculiar to certain social groups in both Lithuania and Russia may be considered as a basis for further development of the historical dialogue. It is assumed that such research may contribute to the improvement in the field of politics of history.
Reference
1. Poslanie Prezidenta Federal'nomu Sobraniju Rossijskoj Federacii [Address of the President of Russia to the Federal Assembly], 25.04.2005, available at:http://www. rg. ru/2005/04/25/poslanie-text. html (accessed 12 January 2012).
2. Safronovas, V. 2009, O tendencijah politiki vospominanija v sovremennoj Litve [On the trends in modern politics memories Lithuania], Ab Imperio: Studies of New Imperial History and Nationalism in the Post-Soviet Space, no 3, p. 424—458.
3. Kasparavičius, A., Laurinavičius, Č., Lebedeva N. (eds.). 2006, SSSR i Litva v gody Vtoroi mirovoi voiny: Sbornik dokumentov [Soviet Union and Lithuania during
the Second World War: a collection of documents], Vilnius, Lietuvos istorijos instituto ledykla.
4. Troebst, S. 2004, «Kakoj takoj kover?» Kul'tura pamjati v postkommunisticheskih obwestvah Vostochnoj Evropy. Popytka obwego opisanija i kategorizacii ["What is this carpet?" Culture of memory in post-communist societies of Eastern Europe. An attempt to describe and categorize the total], Ab Imperio: Studies of New Imperial History and Nationalism in the Post-Soviet Space, no 4, p. 41—77.
5. Assmann, A. 2006, Der lange Schatten der Vergangenheit: Erinnerungskultur und Geschichtspolitik, München.
6. Assmann, J. 1992, Das kulturelle Gedächtnis. Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen, München.
7. Berek, M. 2009, Kollektives Gedächtnis und die gesellschaftliche Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit. Eine Theorie der Erinnerungskulturen, Wiesbaden.
8. Cornelißen, Chr. 2003, Was heißt Erinnerungskultur? Begriff — Methoden — Perspektiven, Geschichte in Wissenschaft und Unterricht, Bd 54, p. 548—563.
9. Erll, A. 2005, Kollektives Gedächtnis und Erinnerungskulturen. Eine Einführung, Stuttgart.
10. Karl, L., Polianski I. J. (eds.). 2009, Geschichtspolitik und Erinnerungskultur im neuen Russland, Göttingen.
11. Mark, J. 2010, The Unfinished Revolution. Making Sense of the Communist Past in Central-Eastern Europe, New Haven and London.
12. Nikžentaitis, A. (ed.), 2011, Nuo Basanavičiaus, Vytauto Didžiojo iki Molotovo ir Ribbentropo: atminties ir atminimo kultūrų transformacijos XX—XXI amžiuje, Vilnius.
13. Troebst, S. 2009, Ein europäischer lieu de mémoire? [A European lieu de mémoire?], Osteuropa, 59. Jhg., no. 7—8, p. 249—256.